<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 31 May 2012 03:26:17 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>tomchester.net -- Analysis Services Articles</title><subtitle>Articles</subtitle><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/atom.xml"/><updated>2011-02-02T17:02:56Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>2011 Public MDX Classes</title><category term="MDX"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2011/2/2/2011-public-mdx-classes.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2011/2/2/2011-public-mdx-classes.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2011-02-02T16:55:07Z</published><updated>2011-02-02T16:55:07Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>May 5-6:&nbsp;Seattle, Portland or remote&nbsp; <a href="http://www.sqlsoft.com/Task/ClassInformation.aspx?ClassID=122833">click here</a></p>
<p>Aug 11-12: Seattle, Portland or remote (link forthcoming)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Words of Wisdom Concerning the Idiocy Known as NoSQL</title><category term="Data Management"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/10/14/words-of-wisdom-concerning-the-idiocy-known-as-nosql.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/10/14/words-of-wisdom-concerning-the-idiocy-known-as-nosql.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2010-10-14T21:42:08Z</published><updated>2010-10-14T21:42:08Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Words of wisdom culled from the internet concerning NoSQL, the&nbsp;grab bag of technologies dredged from the trash heap of decades past:</p>
<p><a href="http://teddziuba.com/2010/03/i-cant-wait-for-nosql-to-die.html">I can't wait for NoSQL to die</a></p>
<p><a href="http://community.ingres.com/forum/comp-databases-ingres/11713-re-info-ingres-nosql-end-rdbms.html">It's painful to watch a hierarchical data model being touted as if it were something new</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhnGarRsKnA">Brian Aker's hilarious presentation</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>MDX Course Oct 21-22</title><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/8/23/mdx-course-oct-21-22.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/8/23/mdx-course-oct-21-22.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2010-08-23T15:46:59Z</published><updated>2010-08-23T15:46:59Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Two day course which can be attended in Seattle (Bellevue), Portland (Beaverton),&nbsp;or remotely. Go <a href="http://www.sqlsoft.com/coursedescriptions/S-465.html">here</a> for details.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>MDX Course, Aug 12-13</title><category term="MDX"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/6/16/mdx-course-aug-12-13.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/6/16/mdx-course-aug-12-13.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2010-06-16T17:25:27Z</published><updated>2010-06-16T17:25:27Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>This is a two day course which can be attended in Seattle (Bellevue), Portland (Beaverton),&nbsp;or remotely. Go <a href="http://www.sqlsoft.com/coursedescriptions/S-465.html">here</a> for details.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Performance Point 2010</title><category term="Front-Ends"/><category term="Performance Point 2010"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/6/1/performance-point-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/6/1/performance-point-2010.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2010-06-01T17:52:00Z</published><updated>2010-06-01T17:52:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[In Performance Point 2010, Microsoft has corrected some of the fatal shortcomings that exist in the 2007 version.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Many-to-Many Dimensions, How Scalable?</title><category term="AS2008"/><category term="Analysis Services"/><category term="OLAP Design"/><category term="dimension"/><category term="many to many"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/5/30/many-to-many-dimensions-how-scalable.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/5/30/many-to-many-dimensions-how-scalable.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2010-05-30T17:19:51Z</published><updated>2010-05-30T17:19:51Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[SSAS introduced the concept of many-to-many relationships between dimensions, an outstanding development that partially overcomes the rigidity of strict star/snowflake schemas. But with this feature came all sorts of warnings from Microsoft.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Data Warehousing Not So Best Practices</title><category term="Data Management"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/5/12/data-warehousing-not-so-best-practices.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2010/5/12/data-warehousing-not-so-best-practices.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2010-05-12T16:49:54Z</published><updated>2010-05-12T16:49:54Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Certain rules of database design are commonly discarded in data warehouses, not necessarily for the good.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Performance Point, Ugh</title><category term="Front-Ends"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2009/6/25/performance-point-ugh.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2009/6/25/performance-point-ugh.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2009-06-26T02:27:14Z</published><updated>2009-06-26T02:27:14Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Performance Point 2007 is one of the most abysmal pieces of BI-related software I've had the misfortune of working with. In short:</p>
<ul>
<li>Analytic Grids/Charts, which otherwise have some&nbsp;nice features, provide what is beyond a doubt the drabbest&nbsp;UI I've seen since the advent of the GUI. </li>
<li>Scorecards can be made to look decent, but are so lacking in functionality as to be nearly useless.</li>
<li>Planning Server is so dysfunctional that it's a joke.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Ongoing De-Evolution of Data Management</title><category term="Data Management"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2009/4/9/ongoing-de-evolution-of-data-management.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2009/4/9/ongoing-de-evolution-of-data-management.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2009-04-09T17:50:53Z</published><updated>2009-04-09T17:50:53Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[It's bad enough that we've had XML foisted on us. It's become a regular occurrence that Microsoft foists some new, lame data store, e.g. SharePoint lists. The final salt in the wound are the self-anointed experts who applaud these abysmal technologies.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Drillthrough</title><category term="AS2008"/><category term="Analysis Services"/><category term="Drillthrough"/><category term="OLAP Design"/><id>http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2008/10/29/drillthrough.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomchester.net/articles/2008/10/29/drillthrough.html"/><author><name>Tom</name></author><published>2008-10-29T16:43:09Z</published><updated>2008-10-29T16:43:09Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[It's rare that a cube will contain transaction details. So once a user drills down to the bottom of a cube, it's common to want to see the transactions that comprise a given value. That's what drillthrough is for, or at least that was the case in the old days.]]></summary></entry></feed>
